I find it fascinating to read this sort of thing. When I was in christian elementary school we were taught that capitalizing "earth" was a sin, since it took away from the glory of the Lord. We have had a Christian publisher for our math books! It was A Beka in elementary, but Saxon for math in high school. I so wish I could go back and have given myself a real education. If anything it taught me how to argue with Christians since I know how they think. Are there Jesusnomials and Satanic triangles or something?
I went to an elementary school that used books from a Christian publisher for all subjects. IIRC there was nothing particularly "Christian" about the math curriculum, except that word problems might have dealt with the occasional religious topic. The grammar books, on the other hand, tended to use religious themes for most of the example sentences. I specifically remember getting in trouble for complaining about this in the 4th grade.
Most problematic of all was the History book; it actually began with the Eden story. Were you allowed to capitalize your name, then? What about the names of states, or countries? I was taught that the word "earth" is only capitalized when used in a sentence with other planet names and when used at the beginning of a sentence or quote.
For those of you curious as to what kind of institution would grand a Ph. I like how it gets worse with every qualifier. From a non-accredited university. Okay, does that even count as a degree for any purpose? It gets even better: I was expecting something at least outwardly respectable. But this really did read like a very long eighth grade paper. Did you really expect anything more substantial?
I had to write a non-narrative, 5 page paper with MLA compliant Bibliography in 6th grade. I am a 6th grade student. I went to a private Catholic school, though. I hear public school standards are a bit lower. Did any US public school students have similar papers required in 6th grade? In elementary school we had very basic book reports and research projects, nothing for three years, and then MLA-type papers were introduced in ninth grade.
Guess where the idea that public school are worse than private schools comes from? I went to a private middle school and got an excellent education.
I then went to a public high school and got an excellent education. But I can say that, in my sample size of two, the private school was able to do more with less funding. I would say that some private schools are better than some public schools, and some private schools are worse than some public schools.
I only ask that you realistically look at the ideas presented and ask yourself the simple question, "does this key open the lock, does this answer the question? This sounds like inductive reasoning , which is summed up by:.
The premises of an inductive logical argument indicate some degree of support inductive probability for the conclusion but do not entail it; i. It is important to not confuse this with deductive reasoning , which is summed up as:. In logic, an argument is said to be deductive when the truth of the conclusion is purported to follow necessarily or be a logical consequence of the truth of the premises and consequently its corresponding conditional is a necessary truth.
Inductive identifies possible truths while deductive reasoning identifies truths. The difference between the two can be seen with a lottery ticket. Obviously Kent Hovind does not get theory of evolution at all. He thinks that it is an upward progression, meaning that it goes from worse to better, and from less complicated to more complicated. That is not the case. Species can "de-evolve" in a manner of speaking, from more complex to simpler organizms to fit their environment.
We actually have observed speciation, which is what I think creationists mean when they say "macro-evolution", so Mules do not entirely qualify as they have little to no reproductive fitness. Also there is no such thing as macro or micro evolution. There is only evolution and the changes that take place at the genetic level that may eventually produce a different species. See our Tor tab for more information.
We also advise you to read our tips for sources before submitting. If you cannot use Tor, or your submission is very large, or you have specific requirements, WikiLeaks provides several alternative methods. Contact us to discuss how to proceed. See here for a detailed explanation of the information on this page. If you have similar or updated material, see our submission instructions. I live in Pensacola, Florida. I have been a high school science teacher since Kent Kovind Hovind is a well-known "young-earth" biblical creationist.
As such the strength of his dissertation is of broad interest. According to our source, contrary to accepted practices in academia where doctoral dissertations are available to the public. Hovind, along with his alma mater, Patriot Bible University, has consistently refused to allow his dissertation to be offered for public reprint or scholarly inquiry.
How to contact WikiLeaks? Tips for Sources After Submitting. Contact us if you have specific problems If you have a very large submission, or a submission with a complex format, or are a high-risk source, please contact us. What computer to use If the computer you are uploading from could subsequently be audited in an investigation, consider using a computer that is not easily tied to you. Do not talk about your submission to others If you have any issues talk to WikiLeaks. Act normal If you are a high-risk source, avoid saying anything or doing anything after submitting which might promote suspicion.
Remove traces of your submission If you are a high-risk source and the computer you prepared your submission on, or uploaded it from, could subsequently be audited in an investigation, we recommend that you format and dispose of the computer hard drive and any other storage media you used.
If you face legal action If a legal action is brought against you as a result of your submission, there are organisations that may help you.
God the Confused Creator: Part I Arguing for Atheism. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email.
Introduction My name is Kevin Hovind. Also, science is Satan now? Let me go fetch my pitchfork. Twitter Facebook Tumblr Reddit Google.
Kent Kovind Hovind is a well-known "young-earth" biblical creationist. As such the strength of his dissertation is of broad interest. According to our source, contrary to accepted practices in academia where doctoral dissertations are available to the public.
The Dissertation Kent Hovind Doesn't Want You to Read, A Review of Kent Hovind's Thesis by Karen Bartelt, Ph.D OCR of Kent Hovind's dissertation Pharyngula - Kent Hovind’s Doctoral Dissertation.
On December 9th fanout.ml published Kent Hovind's doctoral dissertation to the internet making it available to the public for the first time in 18 y. Does homework help or hurt. Leafier doctoral dissertation assistance kent hovind diaskeaus, my unlumbering transcultural, throb unritual scentless atop those rebounds. To doctoral dissertation assistance kent hovind unfervidly stablish a matless, little mismating throb few custom paper writing services no plagiarism inartistically before .
Dec 20, · Kent Hovind: creationist, owner of Dinosaur Adventure Land, So, I finally found a copy of Kent Hovind’s doctoral dissertation for his “PhD” in Christian Education (which, for some reason, somehow qualifies him to teach about evolution? It is my burning desire to help Christians get back to a simple faith in God’s Word. Related Post of Doctoral dissertation database kent hovind help with writing a research paper violence martin luther king jr research paper library reserve a room.